CHRONOLOGY/HISTORY OF THE

FAIRPORT, PAINESVILLE & EASTERN

RAILROAD/RAILWAY

(A key to sources is listed at the bottom of the page)

 

 

The FP&E was incorporated on July 18, 1910 for the purpose of establishing a rail line between Fairport Harbor and Austinburg.  [O1,5]  (Sources 1 and 6 state the date of incorporation as 7/16/1910, but though the Articles of Incorporation were signed on that date, the filing date of the documents with the State of Ohio was 7/18/1910.)

It was not owned by any other corporation or entity.  [1]

Though the FP&E and Diamond Alkali had some common shareholders, and though the railroad was built in conjunction with and primarily to serve the Diamond Alkali's newly-constructed Painesville plant, the companies were independent of each other.  [2,5]

 

The initial segment of the railroad, from the connection with the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad in Fairport Harbor to "Alkali" (the FP&E's station name for the western side of the Diamond plant) was constructed in 1910 and 1911.  [7]

The railroad began operations on January 6, 1912.  [1,2,7,8]

The rest of the original main line of the railroad, from "Alkali" to the connection with the New York Central Railroad at Painesville, was completed and put into operation in 1916.  [7]

 

As of June 30, 1917 the FP&E main line was 4.853 miles long (from the connection with the NYC to the connection with the B&O), and there were 3.398 miles of yard tracks and sidings.  [1]

Also as of that date, the FP&E owned 2 steam locomotives, 14 freight cars, and 1 work car.  In addition, the FP&E leased 1 locomotive from the Nickel Plate Road (New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad).  [1]

 

The FP&E built a dock facility along the Grand River in Fairport Harbor; upon completion (just after 6/30/17), the dock was sold to Diamond Alkali.  [1]

 

As of June 27, 1919 the FP&E had 3 steam locomotives and about 60 freight cars (mostly open-top hoppers for transporting limestone from Diamond Alkali's dock to Diamond Alkali's plant).  [2]

 

In 1926 the FP&E purchased an additional steam locomotive, and constructed a roundhouse/car repair shop with a turntable, an office building, and additional connecting and yard tracks.  (Until this time, the FP&E had been renting space from Diamond Alkali for housing and repairing their equipment and for doing their paperwork; by 1925, Diamond Alkali's business had increased to the point that they needed to use all of their facilities, and they notified the FP&E that they needed to move out in the near future).  [2,3]

 

Also in 1926 the FP&E purchased 100 70-ton open-top hoppers from Diamond Alkali (Diamond Alkali was the original owner of these railcars, having taken delivery of them in October 1922).  [4]

 

As of 1927 the FP&E had direct connections with the NYC at Painesville and the B&O at Fairport Harbor; there was interchange traffic with the NKP, but it was handled via the B&O (from the B&O-NKP junction in Painesville to the B&O-FP&E junction in Fairport Harbor).  [5]

Also as of 1927 the FP&E had 7 steam locomotives and 263 freight cars.  [5]

 

In 1927 and 1928 the FP&E constructed an extension of their main line from a point just before their interchange trackage with the NYC at Painesville to a point just outside the limits of the village of Madison—a distance of about 6 miles.  The primary purpose of this extension was to establish a direct connection with the NKP at Perry; the secondary purpose was to take another step toward reaching Austinburg.  The extension passed underneath the NYC line slightly east of the FP&E-NYC interchange, then ran eastward parallel and to the south of the NYC line all the way to Perry; at Perry the FP&E crossed the NKP at grade, then continued east parallel and to the south of the NKP line into Madison Township.  [5,7,8]

When the FP&E received approval to build the extension to Madison from the Interstate Commerce Commission, it also received approval to construct a spur from a point near the end of the extension southward to a point on the northern bank of the Grand River—a distance of approximately 2 miles.  The purpose of the spur was to access shale beds on the bank of the Grand River for the Diamond Alkali's Standard Portland Cement Plant (which owned or controlled the shale beds).  The spur was never built because "the attitude of officials of Ohio toward grade crossings changed," and instead of being allowed to cross South Ridge Road at grade, the FP&E was required to have their spur pass over the road—something which was deemed by the railroad to be too expensive.  [5,6]

During the construction of the extension, the FP&E constructed a new interchange with the NYC at Perry.  When this new connection was completed, nearly all interchange traffic with the NYC was shifted from Painesville to Perry; by 1933 only empty cars were interchanged at the FP&E-NYC Painesville connection.  [7]

 

As of 1930 the FP&E had 6 steam locomotives and 250 open-top freight cars.  [6]

 

In 1930 and 1931 the FP&E constructed an extension of their main line from its current eastern terminus in Madison Township to Harpersfield Township in Ashtabula County for the purpose of accessing shale beds for the Diamond Alkali's Standard Portland Cement Plant (which owned or controlled the shale beds).  This extension saw traffic for only 3 months—from 11/10/1931 to 2/6/1932—during which time only 310 loads of shale were transported over the line from the shale beds to the cement plant; no further operations occurred on the line after 2/6/1932.  [6,7]

At the time of the Harpersfield extension, the FP&E also requested permission to further extend their line from Harpersfield Township to Austinburg to interchange with the Pennsylvania Railroad (as was the original design/intention when the FP&E was created in 1910); the PRR and Diamond Alkali supported the request, while the NKP and the NYC opposed it (both feared the PRR would siphon a large portion of interchange traffic away from them).  The ICC denied the request, citing any gains in transport time claimed by proponents would be minimal and would not justify the cost of constructing the extension (about $1,000,000.00).  [6]

 

In 1932 the FP&E again requested an extension of their main line from Harpersfield Township to Austinburg; the PRR and Diamond Alkali again supported the request, while the NKP again opposed it.  In 1933, the ICC once again denied the request—for the same reason as earlier, but adding that the case put forth by the extension's proponents was even less compelling than in 1930.  [7]

 

In 1937 the FP&E changed the designation of its main line in the Diamond Alkali area through a 'property swap' with that company; this corresponded with a realignment of Fairport-Nursery Road, which was pushed further south on the eastern portion of the Diamond's facility.  The FP&E main line was changed from a track that travelled through the plant (roughly southwest-to-northeast) to a track that was recently built along the southern border of the plant complex (parallel and to the north of the relocated Fairport-Nursery Road); the property making up the former main line right-of-way was transferred from the FP&E to Diamond Alkali, and the property making up the new main line right-of-way was transferred from Diamond Alkali to the FP&E.  [V:"FPOE RR.pdf",V:"fpe rr3.pdf",T:12A-059OLD2,T:12A-051OLD2]

 

In 1937 and 1938 the FP&E built a branch to serve the new Industrial Rayon Corporation.  [T:11B-043,CP1,CP2]

 

On November 6, 1942 a dispute between the UMW (United Mine Workers) and the BREF (Brotherhood of Railroad Engineers and Fireman) over which union should represent FP&E employees resulted in a work stoppage that shut down the railroad.  Since the FP&E served 13 'defense plants,' the federal government stepped in and sent US Army troops that night to operate the railroad until the two unions were forced to come to an agreement by the War Labor Board a few days later.  [I]

 

Sometime either during or just after the end of World War II, the track from Perry to Harpersfield Township was removed.  [DR,HH]

 

As of 1966 the FP&E had a main line 8.52 miles long (from the connection with the B&O at Fairport Harbor to the connections with the NYC and the Norfolk & Western Railway at Perry), had 1.85 miles of branch lines, and had 9.64 miles of yard tracks and sidings, for a grand total of 20.01 miles of track.  [8]

Also as of 1966, the FP&E had 5 diesel locomotives, 94 open-top hoppers, and 1 caboose.  [8]

(For more about the FP&E's diesel locomotives, see my FP&E Diesel Roster page.)

 

In November and December 1965 the N&W and a majority of FP&E's shareholders negotiated a deal that would allow the N&W to purchase the FP&E.  The FP&E would not be merged into the N&W, but would become a wholly-owned subsidiary of that railroad.  [8,TW1]

In January 1966 the N&W requested permission from the ICC for the deal to be allowed; at the same time, in anticipation of being granted permission, they set up a subsidiary company—the "FP&E Company"—to be ready to buy out the FP&E Railroad.  (After the transactions were completed, the N&W planned on changing the name of its subsidiary from "FP&E Company" back to "Fairport, Painesville and Eastern Railroad Company" or something similar.)  In March 1966, the NYC filed a petition with the ICC to be included in the transaction, complaining that the N&W's sole control of the FP&E would mean that its interchange traffic with the FP&E would be diverted to N&W, and that only joint control would keep the competitive status quo.  The B&O also filed a petition, but stated that they had no problem with the N&W having sole control of the FP&E, as it would not make a difference in B&O-FP&E interchange traffic levels—they only wanted inclusion in the transaction if the NYC was allowed to be included so as to share in the benefits of ownership (i.e., to get its share of the money the FP&E made—for the FP&E was a very profitable railroad).  [8,TW1,TW2,TW3]

In March 1967 an ICC Hearing Examiner recommended that the N&W be granted sole control of the FP&E; however, in August 1967 the ICC as a whole decided that joint ownership of the FP&E by the NYC and the N&W would be best for competitive reasons, and ordered that a) both the N&W and the NYC split the shares of newly-formed FP&E Company, and b) that the FP&E Company buy out the Fairport, Painesville & Eastern Railroad; the ICC excluded the B&O from the transactions because their interchange traffic with the FP&E would not be threatened regardless of who controlled the FP&E.  [8,TW4]

The ICC decision took effect on September 15, 1967, and the railroads were given 180 days from that point (March 13, 1968) to consummate the transactions.  [TW4]

Within months of the ICC's decision, the NYC and the PRR merged to form the Penn Central railroad; in February 1968 and again in April 1968, the N&W filed petitions with the ICC to have the August decision re-examined, claiming that the Penn Central merger altered any competitive issues regarding FP&E interchange traffic, and that the N&W should be given sole control of the FP&E.  The ICC denied both petitions.  [TW5,TW6,TW7,TW8]

The joint N&W/PC takeover of the FP&E took place on August 15, 1968—an event that was signified by changing the name of the "FP&E Company" (which was, in effect, a 'paper railroad' set up to handle the financial and legal issues of the takeover) to the "Fairport, Painesville and Eastern Railway Company" (the new operating railroad).  [O2,PC]

On the same day, the "Fairport, Painesville and Eastern Railroad Company"—the original, independent company chartered in 1910—changed its name to the "Fairport Corporation," then dissolved itself.  [O3,O4]

 

In 1976 and 1977 the Diamond Shamrock shut down its Painesville Works.  The plant closing reduced the FP&E's traffic by 56%.  [O6,NW]

(For more about the Diamond's Painesville Works, see my Diamond/FP&E page.)

 

In 1977 Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. built a spur track from the Perry Nuclear Power Plant to a point on the FP&E near the end of the "Rayon branch"; though the FP&E operated over this track, it was not owned by the railroad.  [Rc:V971-39,Sv:11B-49-1]

 

In 1978 the FP&E sold two of its diesels: #104 was sold to North Star Steel at Wilton, IA in September, and #103 was sold to Ft. Howard Paper at Green Bay/Ashwaubenon, WI in October.  [SL1,SL2,SL3,SL4]

(For more about the dispositions of the FP&E's diesel fleet, see my FP&E Diesel Roster page.)

 

In 1980 Industrial Rayon closed its Painesville plant, causing another significant reduction in the FP&E's traffic.  [PT,NW]

 

In October 1981 the B&O (Chessie System) abandoned its rail line known as the Lake Branch from a point just north of Warren to the end of the line in Fairport Harbor and Grand River.  From March to July 1982 all of the track was removed except for two segments: the section of track from the interchange with Conrail at Painesville Yard to Grand River, which was used by Conrail under a trackage rights agreement up to the time of the abandonment (and was subsequently bought outright by Conrail after the abandonment), and the section of track from the junction of the FP&E and the B&O to the US Industrial Chemicals plant in Fairport Harbor, which was bought by that company so that it could continue rail service via the FP&E (though the FP&E operated over this short stretch of track, it was not owned by the railroad).   [BO,S,10,Rc:V348-491,Rc:V348-494]

 

In 1983 the FP&E moved only 1,415 revenue carloads (compared to 1976, when it moved over 18,000 carloads).  [NW]

 

As of the beginning of 1984 the FP&E had 4 office staff, and 13 'road' personnel: 1 yardmaster, 2 clerks, 5 trainmen, 3 equipment maintenance men and 2 maintenance-of-way men.  [NW]

Also as of the beginning of 1984, the FP&E had 5 remaining diesel locomotives: 4 classified as operable, 1 classified as unserviceable.  [NW]

 

As of 1983 the FP&E had been losing money nearly every year since the Diamond Shamrock plant closed in 1976.  The Penn Central Corporation (which still existed—albeit not as a railroad—and still owned 50% the FP&E along with many other non-railroad investments) believed the losses would continue for the foreseeable future, and, wanting to cut these losses, offered to sell their stake in the FP&E to the N&W.  The N&W, also realizing the FP&E was most likely never going to operate at a profit again, decided to move on the PCC's offer—and further, decided merging the FP&E into the N&W was the only way to continue to serve the remaining customers on the line without constantly absorbing losses (making the line into a N&W branch was far more economical than letting the FP&E exist as a separate entity).  The N&W and the PCC made a stock purchase agreement in December 1983, with the stock transaction to be executed upon the ICC's approval of their plan.  [NW]

On March 1, 1984 the N&W requested that the ICC allow it to buy out the PCC's 50% share of the FP&E, and then allow the N&W to merge the FP&E into itself.  [NW]

On May 7, 1984 the ICC granted the N&W's requests, with the decision taking effect on June 13, 1984.  [9]

On June 28, 1984 the FP&E was officially merged out of existence.  [O5]

 

 

 

Sources

(For more information about some of these sources, see my FP&E Resources page.)

 

[1] 110 ICC 692, Valuation Docket 474: FP&E RR as of 6/30/1917, published 4/3/1925

[2] 58 ICC 549, 10236: Diamond Alkali v FP&E RR Co, 6/27/1919

[3] 105 ICC 334, Finance Docket 5199: Notes of FP&E RR, 1/13/1926

[4] 105 ICC 297, Finance Docket 5246: FP&E RR Equipment Trust, 1/14/1926

[5] 124 ICC 393, Finance Docket 6072: Construction of Extension by FP&E RR Co, 4/28/1927

[6] 166 ICC 737, Finance Docket 6072: FP&E RR Co Construction, 11/22/1930

[7] 193 ICC 375, Finance Docket 9599: FP&E RR Co Proposed Construction, 8/9/1933

[8] 330 ICC 672, Finance Docket 23980: N&W Rwy Co – Control – FP&E Co – Purchase – FP&E RR Co, 8/7/1967

[9] ICC Finance Docket 30427: N&W Rwy Co – Control and Merger Exemption - FP&E Rwy Co, 5/7/1984

[10] STB Docket 565 Sub 11X: NYC Lines LLC/CSX – Abandonment Exemption – Lake County, OH, 2002-2004

[O1] State of Ohio, Articles of Incorporation, FP&E RR, 7/18/1910

[O2] State of Ohio, Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, FP&E Company, 8/15/1968

[O3] State of Ohio, Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, FP&E RR, 8/15/1968

[O4] State of Ohio, Certificate of Dissolution, Fairport Corp, 8/15/1968

[O5] State of Ohio, MEX Certificate, FP&E Rwy Co, 6/28/1984

[O6] Ohio EPA DSPW Site, Director's Final Findings and Orders, 9/27/1995

[V:XXX] Lake County Railroad Valuation Map

[T:XXX] Lake County Tax Map

[Sv:XXX] Lake County Survey Map

[Rc:XXX] Lake County Recorder Document

[CP1] Cleveland Press, 8/8/1936, "Rayon to Build 7-Million Plant"

[CP2] Cleveland Press, 2/29/1940, "Rayon Will Start Its Addition Soon"

[PT] Painesville Telegraph, 8/6/1980, "Shutdown Final for IRC Fibers in Painesville"

[TW1] Traffic World, 2/5/1966, "N&W Plans to Acquire FP&E Property in Ohio"

[TW2] Traffic World, 4/9/1966, "NYC Seeks Joint Ownership Of Ohio Carrier With N&W"

[TW3] Traffic World, 3/18/1967, "Sole Control of FP&E By N&W Recommended; B&O, NYC Pleas Rejected"

[TW4] Traffic World, 8/19/1967, "N&W and NYC May Acquire Joint Control of FP&E; Division 3 Excludes B&O"

[TW5] Traffic World, 2/10/1968, "N&W Says Issues of Rail Competition in FP&E Case Should Be Reviewed by ICC"

[TW6] Traffic World, 2/24/1968, "ICC Sees No 'GTI' Issue In FP&E Control Case"

[TW7] Traffic World, 4/20/1968, "N&W Says PC Merger Changed FP&E Situation"

[TW8] Traffic World, 6/15/1968, "ICC Denies N&W Petition to Review FP&E Control"

[PC] Penn Central, Annual Report of Affiliated Corporations, 1970

[BO] Baltimore & Ohio, Application for Abandonment and Discontinuance of Operations Between Copperweld and Fairport Harbor, 10/1/1980

[NW] Norfolk & Western, Application for FP&E Control and Merger, 3/1/1984

[I] Industrialists in Olive Drab, Chapter 6, "The Fairport, Painesville and Eastern Railroad Case, November 1942"

[DR] Don Rodgers, member of the Nash family of Madison Township

[HH] Herbert Harwood Jr., railroad historian and author

[S] The Sentinel, "EM-1s On the Narrow Gauge: B&O Lake Branch in the 1950s," July/August 1988

[SL1] The Short Line 38, Mar-Apr 1979

[SL2] The Short Line 45, May-June 1980

[SL3] The Short Line 68, Mar-Apr 1984

[SL4] The Short Line 75, May-June 1985

 

 

 

Back to the main page

 

Created by Scott Nixon

July 2009